battle of the bridge referee

Had I seen that last incident, Dembele would have been dismissed.

One thing I certainly dont want to do is be the centre of attention..

The Hoddle of Coffee: Tottenham news and links for Thursday, July 21, Conversations at a bar on a Wednesday night, Tottenham Hotspur Daily Links: The Hoddle Of Coffee, Conte: Djed Spence was a club signing, but he still wants him at Spurs.

Spurs were ahead 2-0 at half-time in what was a robustly fought game.

You would imagine some needle from the likes of Diego Costa but players who rarely got into trouble started doing things you would never have expected from them.

But I dont think it happened here. Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies. The big difference this time is that VAR is in action. "I allowed them [Spurs] to self-destruct so all the media, all the people in the world went: 'Tottenham lost the title.'.

What happens if Christian Eriksen hits a 30-yard screamer? It was pure theatre that Tottenham self-destructed against Chelsea and Leicester won the title. Chelsea fans must remain calm on transfer silence, 4 players Chelsea must keep at all costs for the 2022/2023 season. 'Clattenburg cost Tottenham the title.' Clattenburg was regarded as the Premier League's top official during that season before departing in February 2017 to take up a role with the Saudi Arabian Football Federation.

Start your Independent Premium subscription today.

Im not interested in re-litigating the arguments that popped up in the wake of the Battle of the Bridge, nor am I making any sort of argument that Clattenburg cost Spurs the win and the chance at a Premier League title.

Football Live | Football Results | Player Scored.

Referee Mark Clattenburg showed Spurs players nine yellow cards in the game, a Premier League record for a single team.

Some referees would have played by the book; Tottenham would have been down to seven or eight players and probably lost and they would've been looking for an excuse.

The crucial result came at Stamford Bridge as Chelsea drew 2-2 with Spurs.

But I am irritated that Clattenburg has made himself again the focal point of attention for a match in which he hardly came out smelling like a rose.

Clattenburg has run his mouth but to what effect and for what purpose?

Rose and Willian came to blows as well as the match threatened to get out of control, VAR was used in nine FA Cup ties and will also be used during the EFL Cup semi-finals. Referees haven't been allowed to speak for years.

Mark Clattenburg was always a referee who divided opinion with his style of refereeing on the pitch, and his erratic behaviour off it. I allowed them to self-destruct.

We respect your privacy and take protecting it seriously, Copyright 2022 Talk Chelsea I Powered by RackSRV, If you would like to feature on Talk Chelsea.

All week they had been talking about beating Spurs at all costs.

He has now spoken out about the clash and revealed it was his intention for Mauricio Pochettino's side to lose their heads. Tuesday's referee, Michael Oliver, has taken charge of this match three times.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.

Champions of England.

Refereeing this kind of match is a fine balancing act between applying the laws and managing the spectacle. All rights reserved. Mark Clattenburg has revealed he allowed #thfc to "self-destruct" against @ChelseaFC in the 2015-16 season for entertainment rather than officiate the game.

I find that argument unconvincing on a number of levels, but especially dismiss the idea that a referee, generally considered one of the best in the Premier League at the time, would conspire to throw a match to one side or another.

It was theatre. [@SportdecApp] Transfer News LIVE: Bayern Munich 'will target Harry Kane next summer' and Barcelona make late attempt to Erik ten Hag insists he CAN'T wait around for Cristiano Ronaldo to return to training as star's absence Alexandre Lacazette 'is a doubt to feature in Lyon's friendly against Feyenoord after suffering 10 WASP Floyd Mayweather is SLAMMED for installing a 'monstrous' 15,000 car seat lined with real mink fur in his Barcelona president Joan Laporta tells a fan in Las Vegas that Jules Kounde will sign for Chelsea and NOT 'RIP Nate Diaz's career': UFC fans claim the MMA legend 'has signed his death sentence' as he opens as a Ed Slater's JustGiving page reaches DOUBLE its 20,000 target within 24 hours, as thousands of donations Dina Asher-Smith claims 200m bronze at World Championships to earn GB's third medal and insists she is 'so CHRIS WHEELER: Anthony Martial moves from Man United outcast to first-choice No 9 as Erik ten Hag confirms Raphael Varane says Manchester United stars DON'T think they are better off without Cristiano Ronaldo, Erik ten Hag tells Harry Maguire it's down to HIM to silence the boo boys by impressing them on the pitch JOE BERNSTEIN: Dele Alli's latest gaffe epitomises the malaise affecting him and Everton. The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

In effect, what Clattenburg is saying is that he failed to enforce the rules of the game by sending off Tottenham players that deserved it, and by doing so actually gave Spurs an undeserved chance to win the game.

Can Chelsea overcome their squad and selection challenges to compete with Liverpool and City next season?

Play it now. What now?

Cest la vie.

Were Today and Sunrise BANNED from asking Cam Smith about rebel LIV tour? I can understand, after the abuse I've had today, why people don't want to become referees. Published: 17:34 EDT, 7 January 2019 | Updated: 13:06 EDT, 8 January 2019. Had he started sending players off instead of issuing yellows (and Lord knows Tottenham probably shouldve had at least Eric Dier and Jan Vertonghen sent off in that match) the narrative might have been about how Mark Clattenburg ruined the game. Had I seen that last incident, Dembele would have been dismissed. Spurs led 2-0 at half-time at Stamford Bridge before an almighty collapse which led to a series of clashes between the two sets of players. Clattenburg not only turned the attention back to himself, he tried to dodge responsibility for what happened at Stamford Bridge, and make himself look like the hero of the story. In spite of Clattenburg's claims that he was attempting to do the contrary, Gallagher's comments that he made the match "all about him" appear to be true, at least in Clattenburg's own head.

Some referees would have played by the book and Tottenham would have been down to seven or eight players and looking for an excuse. Leicester City. He will know what to expect though it should be a more cagey affair given this is the first leg of a semi-final. The Englishman dished out nine yellow cards to Tottenham players as they dropped a 2-0 lead and Leicester City won the title in 2015/16.

Mark Clattenburg is right about the Battle of the Bridge, but he still looksbad, DiMarzio: Paratici met with AC Milan over Tanganga, Ndombele, Reguilon, The Hoddle of Coffee: Tottenham news and links for Friday, July 22, Report: Fiorentina negotiating a loan for Tottenhams Lo Celso.

We're looking for loyal Balls readers free-to-join members club where top tipsters can win prizes and Balls merchandise, Roy Keane Scared The Shite Out Of Mark Clattenburg The First Time They Met,, Mark Clattenburg Reveals He Went Into Infamous 'Battle Of Stamford Bridge' With Game Plan. Mark Clattenburg hands out one of 12 yellow cards to Danny Rose during the May 2016 match, Mousa Dembele scratches Diego Costa's eye, an act for which he was later banned.

Clattenburgs comments dont show a premeditated plan to give the title to Leicester at Tottenhams expense, but it does come across to me as a tacit admission that not only did Clattenburg know he had lost control of the match early on, but that he then altered his refereeing game plan mid-stream to change the post-match narrative to make himself look better. Moreover, his argument is purile once you get below the surface. We are no longer accepting comments on this article. Rehashing the 2016 draw between Spurs and Chelsea does no one any favors and puts Clattenburg back in his favorite position: the center of attention.

It should have been three red cards to Tottenham.

A number of people tweeted the Euro 2016 final referee with angry responses, and Clattenburg has felt the need to speak again referring to himself in third person to defend his comments. When you're a Premier League referee you're not going to keep everybody happy, you're going to upset some teams.

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in, Please refresh your browser to be logged in. 'Clattenburg cost Tottenham the title'. That's the balance that top-level officials have to try and achieve whats right for the game and the laws and that's what a lot of people don't understand.

Not that Chelsea were choirboys at first blush, it was a minor miracle that nobody was sent off in that match on either side. There would have been few complaints if I had sent off four players that night but equally I could have been accused of ruining what was a great game.

Opinion: Its natural for Chelsea players and staff to feel fearful and unsettled right now, Chelseas shock loss opens up top 4 battle again, READ MORE: Antonio Conte clears up tactical half-time change in Saturdays defeat, Antonio Conte clears up tactical half-time change in Saturdays defeat, Theres a problem in this league Chelsea manager Antonio Conte reveals concerns, Mark Clattenburg said his comments about Chelsea-Tottenham fixture in 2016 were misinterpreted, Clattenburg said he allowed Spurs to self-destruct as they exited the title race. All week they had been talking about beating Spurs at all costs. The big difference this time is that VAR is in action.

Clattenburg says that looking back now, it was a game aided by his refereeing style. hilltop bah But Spurs didnt lose that match, they drew. I want to try and educate and for people to understand. La Viola were interested in the same thing back in January. Something went wrong, please try again later. When speaking to BBC Radio 5 Live, Clattenburg cleared up what he said about not wanting to be the centre of attention in the match. The comments below have been moderated in advance.

Developed by Square1 and powered by, Have a tip or something brilliant you wanted to share on?

The result was enough to hand the title to Leicester City even though they werent playing, and Clattenburg who has since moved to Saudi Arabia to become their head of referees admitted he went into the game looking to avoid becoming the one that stole the headlines. The former referee subsequently claimed that he was able to avoid influencing the result of the game, something that is difficult to believe given he chose not to send three Spurs players off. Looking back, I should have sent off Eric Dier for a lunge on Eden Hazard towards the end.

Thats perhaps the most damning thing about this whole incident: it didnt have to happen this way.

Indeed, had Tottenham seen red in that match for the brutal nature of some of the tackles dished out to their London rivals, then many viewers would have been left in little doubt that Spurs had well and truly, as Clattenburg put it: "self-destructed".

By clicking Create my account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to ourTerms of use,Cookie policyandPrivacy notice. I went in with a gameplan - that I didn't want Tottenham blaming Mark Clattenburg that they were going to lose the title," he told the Men In Blazers podcast.

wwe stackdown smackdown hobbit wowing dozen premier fa league cup weekend drogba stamford scoring didier hazard eden chelsea celebrates victory seal manchester against united